Understanding preferences for receiving health communications and information about clinical trials: a cross-sectional study among US adults

Curr Med Res Opin. 2024 Apr 10:1-13. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2024.2340720. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Effective health communication is critical for understanding and acting on health information. This cross-sectional study explored participants' understanding of their health condition, their preferences for receiving health communications, and their interest in receiving clinical trial results across several therapeutic areas.

METHODS: The study recruited participants via social media, email newsletters, and advocacy organizations. An online screener captured demographic information (health conditions, age, race/ethnicity, gender, and education). Eligible participants were emailed an online survey assessing preferred sources and formats for receiving health information, interest in learning about topics related to the results of clinical trials, and health literacy levels.

RESULTS: In total, 449 participants (median age, 35 years [range, 18─76]; White, 53%; higher education, 65%; mean (range) health literacy score, 1.9 [0.4 ─ 3.0]) from 45 US states completed the survey representing 12 disease indications (bipolar, blood and solid tumor cancers, irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, major depressive disorder, migraine, Parkinson's, psoriasis/atopic dermatitis, retinal vein occlusion/macular degeneration, rheumatoid arthritis, and spasticity). Healthcare providers were the preferred source of health information (59%), followed by internet searches (11%). Least preferred sources were social media (5%), friends/family (3%), and email newsletters (2%). Participants preferred multiple formats and ranked reading materials online as most preferred (33%), along with videos (28%) and infographics (27%). Printed materials (14%) and audio podcasts (9%) were the least preferred formats. A majority of the participants reported that the health information they found was hard to understand (57%) and confusing (62%). Most participants (85%) were somewhat/very interested in learning about clinical trial results, with the highest interest in short summaries of safety (78%) and efficacy (74%) results.

CONCLUSION: Effective health communication may be achieved via multiple formats shared directly by healthcare providers.

PMID:38595182 | DOI:10.1080/03007995.2024.2340720